Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, August 2003, p. 4472-4486, Vol. 71, No. 8
0019-9567/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4472-4486.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Abhijeet A. Bakre,2 Sudha Bhattacharya,2 and Alok Bhattacharya1,3*
School of Life Sciences,1 School of Environmental Sciences,2 Bioinformatics Centre, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India3
Received 21 March 2003/ Returned for modification 15 April 2003/ Accepted 12 May 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The enteric protozoan parasite E. histolytica normally resides in the human gut. It is microaerophilic with optimal growth temperature of 35.5°C. Under conditions that are not yet clearly understood, the actively dividing trophozoites in the gut lumen convert into cysts, which are excreted in the feces. Alternatively, at a much lower frequency, the trophozoites invade the intestinal mucosa and may spread to other organs, notably the liver. In this case the trophozoites would encounter higher temperatures. and oxygen tension due to host inflammatory response. Parasite proteins that are triggered to counteract these stress conditions are of great interest, since these would help us to understand the mechanism of pathogenesis. The ability of E. histolytica trophozoites to invade host tissues and to survive outside the protected environment of the intestine is probably accomplished by a strong adaptive response, involving a number of proteins, some of which may be stress induced. E. histolytica homologues of some of the known HSPs, such as HSP60 (20, 35) and HSP70 (23, 42) have been identified and partially characterized.
Here we report a novel polymorphic antigen in E. histolytica trophozoites, which is encoded by a multigene family and is differentially expressed in response to stress. The polymorphic part of the protein is almost exclusively composed of charged amino acids. The unique protein structure, the high copy number of the gene, and stress-induced regulation of expression of multiple copies point to an important role for this protein in parasite survival within the host.
|
|
|---|
Genomic DNA isolation. DNA was purified essentially as described (6). At the end of the log phase of growth, cells were pooled from 40 tubes after chilling them in ice water for 10 min. A cell pellet was obtained by centrifuging at 275 x g for 7 min at 4°C. Cells (5 x 107 to 10 x 107) were resuspended in 5 ml of buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0]) and lysed by addition of 0.25% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The resulting suspension was extracted with phenol-chloroform and DNA was collected by ethanol precipitation. It was treated with RNase A (100 µg/ml) followed by proteinase K (100 µg/ml). The suspension was again extracted with phenol: chloroform and ethanol precipitated. DNA was dissolved in TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0).
Isolation of chromosomal DNA, PFGE, Southern blotting and hybridization. E. histolytica chromosomal DNA from cells embedded in agarose blocks was prepared as described previously (3). The pulse conditions used for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were 70 s for 12 h, 90 s for 6 h; 120 s for 6 h; 150 s for 6 h; and 170 s for 6 h at 5.5 V/cm. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain YNN6) blocks were used as molecular weight marker.
Genomic DNA (1 µg) was digested with 50 U of restriction enzyme, and separated on 1.0% agarose gel at 4 V/cm. For Southern blotting DNA was transferred to GeneScreen plus (NEN) nylon membranes (28). Blots were hybridized in a solution containing 1% SDS, 1 M NaCl and 3 x 105 cpm ml -1 of DNA probe at 65°C for 16 h. Blots were washed according to manufacturer's instructions and exposed for autoradiography. Radioactive DNA probes were made using the NEBlot random priming kit (NEB, USA).
PCR and RT-PCR. The following primers were used for reverse transcription (RT)-PCR: F2, 5' CGGGTACCATTAAAATGGAAGAGCTAATTAAC 3'; R2, CGGATCCTATAAATCTTCTTCTGAAATTAATTTTTGTTCCATATGTTTCATTTCAATTACTATAAT 3'; ABR-F, 5' GATGAAGAAACACTAAGTAAAACA 3'; ABR-R, 5' AACATATCCTCCAAATTTATTTCC 3', HSPF 5' AGGTATGGATCCAAATG 3'; HSPR 5' CTGCTTGTGCCGTTAAATCA 3'; CABPF, 5' ATCTGTTCTAAACATTAATCATAAACT 3'; CABPR, 5' GCGGGCTCCAGTTTAGAGTGAAAACTC 3'. The Ehssp1 primers were designed based on the reference sequence (ENTJQ44). Primers were obtained from Microsynth, Switzerland. PCR was performed with 400 ng of E. histolytica genomic DNA for 30 cycles.
Total RNA (5 µg) was used in the RT reaction using M-MuLV RT (USB) with Oligo dT primer. The reaction was carried out at 37°C for 1 h followed by inactivation at 95°C for 5 min. Five microliters of this RT mix was used for a regular PCR. No amplicon was observed in the absence of RT enzyme in all RT-PCR experiments. The PCR products were cloned in pGEMTeasy vector (Promega). DNA sequencing was carried out using dideoxy chain termination method (29).
RNA isolation from normal and stressed cells and Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was purified by guanidinium thiocyanate lysis of cells as described (10). RNA samples (20 µg) were resolved in formaldehyde agarose in formaldehyde gel running buffer [0.1 M MOPS (pH 7.0), 40 mM sodium acetate, 5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)] and 37% formaldehyde at 3 to 4 V/cm. The RNA was transferred on to GS+ membrane. Hybridization and washing conditions for RNA blots were carried out as per manufacturer's protocol.
In order to isolate total RNA from Entamoeba cells after heat stress, mid log phase Entamoeba cells (approximately 8 x 10 5 cells) grown in glass tubes were transferred to a water bath maintained at 42°C. At the various time points, the cells were chilled and RNA was extracted. Cells were exposed to oxidative stress by growing them in 10 ml of complete TYI-S-33 medium in a 50-ml tissue culture flask for 1 h at 36°C with gentle shaking at 40 rpm.
DNA dot blots and copy number estimation. DNA dot blots and copy number estimation were carried out as described (30). Briefly, E. histolytica strain HM-1:IMSS genomic DNA and purified Ehssp1 insert DNA were spotted in duplicates in various concentration ranging from 15 to 500 ng. The blot was hybridized using a radiolabeled Ehssp1 probe and the spots were cut out and the amount of radioactivity was measured by scintillation counting. Along with unknown genes the copy number of a few known genes, such as E. histolytica calcium binding protein (copy number 1) was always estimated. For calculation of copy number the size of haploid genome of E. histolytica was taken to be 20 Mb.
Cloning, expression, and partial purification of recombinant Ehssp1 protein. DNA was obtained by RT-PCR amplification of total RNA from exponentially growing E. histolytica cells, using the F2/R2 primers. The Acc65I and BamHI sites present in the primers were utilized to clone the product in pET 30a vector, digested with the same enzymes. The ligated product was used to transform Escherichia coli, BL21(DE 3) competent cells to get pETEhssp1.
Cells containing pETEhssp1 were grown to an OD600 of 0.6, induced with 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) and harvested after 180 min by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm (Remi tabletop centrifuge) for 5 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in 1x phosphate-buffered saline and lysed by sonication (five full pulses for 60 s, with a gap of 120 s). The pellet containing the Ehssp1 protein in inclusion bodies was collected by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 20 min, at 4°C.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. Protein samples were electrophoresed in SDS-PAGE as described (17). Proteins were transferred from gels onto nitrocellulose membranes (36). The blots were immunostained using pooled amebic patient and normal human sera, at a dilution of 1:400, followed by detection by alkaline phosphatase labeled anti-human secondary antibody. Nonspecific blocking was carried out with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline. Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP) in buffer containing 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate and 1 mM MgCl2 was used for color development.
Sequence analysis. BLAST (9) searches (version 2.0 at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST at NCBI, USA and WU-BLAST version 2.0 at www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/E_histolytica/blast_server.shtml Entamoeba BLAST server, Sanger Centre, Hinton, Cambridge, United Kingdom), respectively, were used for finding homologues of SSE58 using the Entamoeba genome sequences deposited regularly in the GSS division of GenBank. The sequencing effort is part of the International Entamoeba Genome Sequencing Project and is supported by award from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Entamoeba genome sequence contig databases from TIGR and the Sanger Centre were also used for analysis. Alignment of multiple sequences was carried out using ClustalW.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences mentioned in the paper have been deposited in the GenBank database with accession numbers, AF322253, AY278996, AY281154, and AY281155.
|
|
|---|
The sequences, upstream and downstream of the Ehssp1 gene were analyzed from a contig (contig 5076, Sanger Entamoeba sequence database) containing the full-length Ehssp1 ORF, for the presence of cis regulatory elements (Fig. 1). The TATA element, GAAC sequence and Initiator sequence described for several Entamoeba genes (7, 27) could be identified upstream of the putative start codon. Sequences further upstream were particularly rich in A+T (84%) compared to 78% A+T in other intergenic regions of E. histolytica (5).
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Ehssp1-5076 gene sequence. Nucleotide sequence along with the amino acid sequence of the transcribed copy of Ehssp1-5076 in strain HM-1:IMSS is shown. The putative promoter consensus sequence, TTATTTAAAC, GAAC, and the transcription initiator ATCA are highlighted. The amino acids in the polymorphic acidic basic region are shown in boldface type. The stop codon is denoted by an asterisk.
|
Ehssp1 protein. BLASTP analysis failed to show any homologue of this gene in the nonredundant database. The encoded protein could be divided into three regions, with a central polymorphic domain (containing 5 to 104 amino acids) separating the N-terminal domain (164 amino acids in most copies with a range of 157 to 167 amino acids) from the C-terminal domain (175 amino acids in most copies with a range of 165 to 181 amino acids) and there were three distinct classes of Ehssp1 that could be seen by sequence analysis (Fig. 2A). Multiple alignment of 21 contigs containing the full-length ORF showed that the N- and C-terminal domains of the various copies were 86% and 74% identical, respectively, at the amino acid level. The polymorphic domain, encoded by a polypurine stretch, was predominantly composed of acidic/basic amino acids (glutamate, arginine and lysine) (Fig. 2B).
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() View larger version (187K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Multiple alignment of different copies of Ehssp1 proteins showing polymorphism. (A) Schematic representation of the three classes of Ehssp1 proteins. The numbers indicate amino acids in each domain. (B) Multiple alignment of different copies of Ehssp1 protein. The polymorphic ABR is marked by arrow. The contigs used for alignment were obtained from the Sanger Entamoeba database.
|
Confirmation of polymorphism in Ehssp1 by genomic Southern and PCR.
From sequence analysis of contigs it was predicted that
90% of Ehssp1 gene copies would fall in the size range of 0.95 to 1.15 kb. This was demonstrated by Southern hybridization. DNA was digested with XmnI, which cuts near the ends of the Ehssp1 gene (Fig. 3A). Hybridization of the Southern blot with Ehssp1 probe showed a broad band with a size range of 0.9 to 1.07 kb (Fig. 3B). Genomic DNA was PCR amplified using primers flanking the ABR (ABR-F and ABR-R). This primer set amplified a cluster of three bands in the size range of 400 to 550 bp and one faint band of 574 bp (Fig. 3C). The bands were diffuse, suggesting size heterogeneity. The PCR amplification pattern for strain HK-9 was very similar to that of strain HM-1:IMSS (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the organization of this gene family is similar in different strains of E. histolytica.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Polymorphism in Ehssp1. (A) Schematic representation of Ehssp1-SSE58 showing the location of PCR primers and DNA probe. Numbers indicate nucleotide positions. Abbreviations: X, XmnI; H, HinfI. (B) Southern blot analysis. Genomic DNA of strain HM-1:IMSS was digested with XmnI, electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel at 4V/cm and transferred to nylon membrane. The blot was hybridized with probe 1. (C) PCR amplification of genomic DNA of strain HM-1:IMSS using ABR-F-ABR-R primer set (D) PCR amplification of genomic DNA of strain HK-9 using ABR-F-ABR-R primer set. The PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1.2% agarose gel at 4V/cm. M, molecular weight markers.
|
![]() View larger version (75K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Chromosomal localization of Ehssp1. (A) Schematic representation of Ehssp1-SSE58 showing the position of DNA probes. The probes used for hybridization were derived from SSE58. Numbers indicate nucleotide positions. Abbreviations: X, XmnI; H, HinfI. (B and C) PFGE-separated chromosomes of strain HK-9 (lane 1) and HM-1:IMSS (lane 2) stained with ethidium bromide (EtBr) and hybridized with probe 2 (B) and probe 3 (C). The bands of strain HK-9 that differentially hybridized with probe 3 are shown by an asterisk. The PFGE run conditions are mentioned in Materials and Methods. Autoradiographic exposure of Southern blots was for 3 days.
|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Analysis of Ehssp1 transcript. (A) Northern blot analysis. Total HM-1:IMSS RNA (30 µg) was electrophoresed in 1.2% formaldehyde agarose gel at 4 V/cm, and transferred to nylon membrane. The blot was hybridized with probe 3 (shown in Fig. 3). M, RNA molecular weight marker. RT-PCR analysis of (B) HM-1:IMSS and (C) HK9 RNA using ABR-F-ABR-R primers (Fig. 3). RT-PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.2% agarose gel at 4 V/cm. M, DNA molecular weight markers.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Alignment of the Ehssp1 protein expressed by exponentially growing cells of the E. histolytica strains HK-9 and HM-1:IMSS. The ABR is indicated with an arrow.
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Transcription of Ehssp1 under stress conditions. (A) Northern blot analysis of RNA from HM-1:IMSS cells grown at 36°C (lane 1); and transferred to 42°C for 1 h (lane 2). Various gene probes were used as indicated on top of each panel. Actin and 28S rDNA probes also served as loading controls. Hsp101 was used as positive control for heat shock treatment. (B) RT-PCR using the ABR-F-ABR-R primer set (Fig. 3), was carried out with total RNA from normal cells (lane 1) and heat treated cells (lane 2). (C) same as panel B except that RNA was from strain HK-9.
|
![]() View larger version (75K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Time course of reversible induction of Ehssp1 genes during heat stress. HM-1:IMSS cells growing at 36°C were transferred to 42°C. At the time points indicated, growth was stopped and RNA was isolated. To study the recovery from heat stress, cells grown at 42°C for 60 min were reverted to 36°C and RNA was isolated at different time intervals. RT-PCR was carried out using ABR-F-ABR-R primers. As controls, RT-PCR was carried out with Ehhsp101 primers (HSP-F/HSP-R, middle panel) and EhCaBP primers (CABP-F/CABP-R, bottom panel). The PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.2% agarose gel at 4 V/cm.
|
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Effect of oxidative stress on the expression of multiple copies of Ehssp1. HM-1:IMSS cells were exposed to oxidative stress for 1 h as described in Materials and Methods. Total RNA was used for RT-PCR analysis with ABR-F-ABR-R primers. The PCR products were resolved in 1.2% agarose gel at 4 V/cm. Lane 1, normal cells; lane 2, cells after oxidative stress.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Ehssp1 homologue in E. dispar. (A) PCR amplification of E. dispar genomic DNA using ABR-F-ABR-R primers. The PCR product was electrophoresed in 1.2% agarose gel at 4 V/cm. (B) The PCR product in (A) was cloned in pGEMT-Easy vector. Clones were randomly picked and the inserts released by digesting with Eco RI. The digests were electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose gel. The portion of the ethidium bromide-stained gel containing the inserts is shown.
|
![]() ![]() View larger version (126K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. (A) Alignment of nucleotide sequence of genomic PCR of E. dispar using ABR-F-ABR-R primers, along with the normally expressed copy of E. histolytica (Ehssp1). (B) The Clustal alignment of four clones showing the degree of variation in the ABR region. The ABR is shown with an arrow.
|
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 12. Expression of Ehssp1-5076 protein and its antigenicity (A) Ehssp1 cDNA was cloned in pET30a vector and expressed in E. coli, BL21(DE3) to give pETEhssp1. One micromolar IPTG was used for induction and the total cell lysate of the induced (lane 1) and uninduced (lane 2) samples was electrophoresed in SDS-12% PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. (B) Western blot analysis of induced (lane 1) and uninduced (lane 2) samples of pETEhssp1. Total cell lysate of the uninduced sample and the pellet fraction (containing the Ehssp1 protein in inclusion bodies) of the induced sample were separated in SDS-12% PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was probed with different antibodies as mentioned. The induced protein band is shown by arrow.
|
|
|
|---|
Apart from the centrally located charged cluster, the other notable feature of Ehssp1 is its polymorphism. In general, polymorphic antigens are very commonly found in protozoan parasites and are implicated in evasion of host immune response by the parasite, and in establishing pathogenesis. Examples of such antigens in P. falciparum are the var gene family (31), the stevor and rif genes (9), the MESA antigen (11), KAHRP protein (38), and the circumsporozoite protein (25). The VSP of Giardia (1) and VSG of Trypanosoma brucei (39) are also polymorphic multigene families of which only one copy is expressed at a time (4). The polymorphic, immunodominant molecule (PIM) of Theileria parva (37) is the predominant antigen recognized by sera from infected cattle. It consists of conserved 5' and 3' termini flanking a polymorphic region which is composed of various numbers of a tetrapeptide repeat. These antigenic molecules perform diverse functions and use a range of mechanisms to generate polymorphism, chief among them being variation in the number and sequence of short repeat motifs, recombination and gene conversion. However, most of these antigens are expressed on the cell-surface, while the structure of Ehssp1, as deduced from nucleotide sequence analysis, makes it unlikely for the protein to be located on the surface.
Perhaps the most intriguing observation regarding Ehssp1 is the change in the quantity and diversity of expression of this gene family in response to stress. Hsp70 is one of the most extensively studied stress-induced genes. Some members of this multigene family are expressed constitutively while others are stress-induced. In mouse, the 5' and 3' untranslated regions of two HSP70 genes (hsp70.1 and hsp70.3) differ from each other, suggesting their involvement in differential regulation of gene copies (40). Nucleotide sequence analysis of the putative 5' and 3' untranslated regions and sequences further upstream and downstream of the Ehssp1 ORF in the various members of the gene family did not show any striking differences between the copy that is transcribed in exponential cells and those that are turned on under stress (data not shown here). Further experiments are needed to understand the basis of this differential expression.
The transcription regulation of Ehssp1 may provide valuable insights into regulation of inducible gene expression in E. histolytica. The increase in expression of Ehssp1 in response to stress was not just due to increase in transcription of a single gene, as is the case for most stress-induced genes, but due to the transcription of different polymorphic copies of the gene, which are silent in the absence of stress. Thus, within the gene family different copies are regulated differentially. Expression of more than one copy of stress-induced genes has been shown for HSP70, HSP27, and HSP26 (34, 14, 18). However these multigene families express only two to four copies under stress conditions, unlike Ehssp1 where stress induces the expression of a very large repertoire of gene copies.
The time kinetics of induction of the multiple copies of Ehssp1 in comparison to a conventional HSP (HSP101) showed that the HSP101 expression reached saturation much faster (within 20 min of heat treatment) indicating that probably the pathways for induction of these two genes are different. Upon withdrawal of heat stress, the expression of all copies of Ehssp1 except the one expressed under normal conditions is shut off.
If Ehssp1 is somehow involved in the process of invasion of the intestinal mucosa by the virulent E. histolytica, then this protein may be dispensable in the nonpathogenic sibling species E. dispar, which is known to colonize the human gut but does not cause invasive disease. However, a homologue of Ehssp1 was found in E. dispar, although polymorphism of ABR was much less pronounced (8 to 38 amino acids). The functional significance of this is not clear at present. Stress response proteins are generally immunodominant antigens in many pathogenic infections. Both circulating antibodies and activated T cells specific for major heat shock proteins of diverse organisms (19) are found in patients. Ehssp1 also stimulates humoral immune response. Humoral response has been shown earlier for E. histolytica HSP70, in a group of patients with invasive amebiasis (23).
Ehssp1 is the first example of differentially regulated gene expression of a multicopy, polymorphic gene family in E. histolytica. This could serve as a good model to study differential gene expression in this organism.
Present address: Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»